Answer to the Supreme Court : Abortion practice is protected in Amendment 4 of the Bill Of Rights under “Persons”

To the 117th United States Congress:

Please create a Bill for the Dignity of Human Rights to be inherent in ‘Persons’ in Amendment 4 of the Bill of Rights.

The Bill of Rights Amendment 4, Persons minimally is about one’s health , safety and welfare. Abortion should be protected as a qualified medical practice

On May 4, 2022, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said “that the Constitution does not protect a right to an abortion”.

When Judge Thomas asked to show where Abortion is protected in the Constitution, in haste, the 5 Trumplican Supreme Court Judges suddenly chomping at the bit to roll back the peoples human rights starting with Abortion. So what would be next, Voting ?

If Human Rights, like the right to an abortion is to mean anything, let it first be found as “Persons” in Amendment 4 when it comes to our health, safety and welfare. Thomas can find it promptly.

The scope and focus of “the Dignity of Human rights” is/are, where in fact you can demonstrate Amendment 4, ‘Persons’ as its placeholder. That is, when considering there is no other place in the Constitution that does address you as a ‘person’ and that’s where the Dignity part starts.

In other words, your rights are untouchable by Federal and State Law. Your rights cannot be taken away.

The Yesterday’s Federalist did an excellent job on the Constitution. The Bill of Rights, thanks to Madison and friends finally got included.

But still, back then , the Bill of Rights was not warmly received by all. One could be impressed that ‘Persons’ was not left out, but not to imposing in definition as to turn off the Senate back then!

But history has shown that the individual, when based on race , color, or creed is still an issue. “Persons” is where we start when wanting to recognize our people as actual human beings when we talk about diversity, equity and inclusion.

You might agree that our model of a Democratically Elected Republic must move forward and not backward. And that in deferring Abortion to state law, is the first attempt at moving backward.

To move forward, “Persons” is yet to be truly defined for its scope and focus in Amendment 4, but at a minimum refers to your health, safety and welfare no matter what state you live in.

When we attribute Amendment 4 ‘Persons’ as having to do with an actual person, like ‘You and Me’, as an example, then there can be the ‘Dignity’ of Human Rights.

Then Amendment 4 makes a lot more sense in how we can regard each other –

Plugging the Black Hole of US Health Care

The Daley Plan

The health of our nation is reflected in its people. Hence, Health Care cannot afford to be an industry if to serve them. The following proposes to redesign the health care system in order to protect the nation and welfare of the people from the obsolescence of the current one.

This is while assuring its benefit to strengthening the US economy with tax payer burden relief of existing Medicare and Medicaid programs.

1- To redesign the profit model of the health care / insurance and drug industry: They (the industry) spend a fortune on IT (information technology) systems where the sole purpose is for denying claims. Proposed is to have them instead process claims on behalf the Dept of Health. This is where they can make a percentage on each claim. Hence, the more claims processed, the more of a fortune they can amass. Consider that there are 300,000,000 Americans. That is regardless if employed or unemployed. Claims processors could bid for the business!

2- The claims for health services provided (from a hospital, practitioner, etc) are to be sent to the Dept of Health. Obviously there would be normalization of pricing, but by no means intending to compromise quality that is provided. This does not mean that medical practitioners need to be the working poor, but obviously cannot price gouge either, as it would be more of a level playing field where quality at competitive prices from practitioners would be looked at favorably by the government.

3- To finance the cost of operations (practitioners, Dept of Health, IT operations, etc), tax exempt bonds are assumed. It is not a requirement that anyone buy into these, but frankly Wall Street would drop their pants to get them. As a private investor, such as in having a 401K, etc, what is left after taxes is not much. Tax exempt means tax exempt and for that matter considered from your gross income and not from your net. In investing in such bonds, you have further lowered your taxable income while having built a very large one for retirement; or to be redeemed at which time you wish.

4- The mechanics of finance: Let us assume that 25% of the total bond financing actually covers item #3 above. Then 75% is exercised on Wall Street to replenish the %25 that is to be used. If and when, and assumed often based on fair and competitive capital market practices, that the 25% exceeds its water mark (hitting 26 – 30%) as an example, that +% is returned to the investors who participate.

5- To appeal to greed is easy to do therefore this can be pushed much faster through Congress. The stake holders in item # 1 can have far greater profits. This is while achieving this with far less convoluted tactics rather than an antiquated bait and switch claim denial model.

6- Tax exempt investments will move the economy with far more momentum than otherwise – Wall Street has greater potential to make fortunes without having to be crooks –

7- Tax payer burden is relieved of an estimated $8 billion per year in costs for Medicare / Medicaid which would be considered obsolete federal and state programs.

By Orion Karl Daley

Election 2008 Presidential Candidate
Author: The New Deal – ISBN